Alabama
ADUs are possible in parts of Alabama, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
Start with the statewide posture, then trace the local ordinance, lot limits, utilities, overlays, and permit path that decide the actual property.
50 statesEvery state has a dated guide
20 active frameworksIncluding limited and opt-out laws
2 additional areasDC and Guam verified
“Statewide” can still mean population thresholds, urban-growth boundaries, municipal opt-outs, or a future implementation date. Each guide keeps those distinctions visible.
52 guides
ADUs are possible in parts of Alabama, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of Alaska, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
Arizona gives many homeowners a strong path to a casita or ADU, but the controlling state rule depends on whether the parcel is in a covered city, town, or county.
Arkansas municipalities must provide a by-right route for at least one qualifying ADU, while building, water, sewer, health, and site rules continue to apply.
California provides one of the country's strongest ADU frameworks, but unit count, configuration, fire access, utilities, coastal review, and local objective standards still change the property-specific result.
Colorado protects one ADU as an accessory use in covered urban jurisdictions, but rural areas and excluded jurisdictions may remain under different local rules.
Connecticut's statute creates a useful ADU baseline, but the first property question is whether the municipality retained it, opted out, or adopted a different local ordinance.
ADUs are possible in parts of Delaware, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of Florida, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of Georgia, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
Hawaii directs the counties to permit qualifying ADUs, but island-specific zoning, water, wastewater, shoreline, hazard, and infrastructure rules remain decisive.
Idaho's new law creates an ADU right in covered cities, but local code updates are still underway and smaller jurisdictions may follow different rules.
ADUs are possible in parts of Illinois, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of Indiana, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
Iowa requires cities and counties to allow at least one ADU, while statewide building requirements and local health, site, and infrastructure rules remain.
ADUs are possible in parts of Kansas, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of Kentucky, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of Louisiana, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
Maine provides a statewide ADU baseline, but shoreland zoning, subsurface wastewater, lot dimensions, water supply, and municipal implementation remain central.
Maryland has adopted a statewide implementation mandate, but on August 6, 2026 each property still requires a check of the jurisdiction's current or newly adopted ordinance.
Massachusetts protects one qualifying ADU by right outside Boston; local dimensional review, Title 5 or sewer, building code, wetlands, flood, and historic rules still apply.
ADUs are possible in parts of Michigan, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of Minnesota, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of Mississippi, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of Missouri, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
Montana broadly protects ADUs, but local objective standards, sanitation, water, wildfire exposure, access, and private restrictions still shape feasibility.
ADUs are possible in parts of Nebraska, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
Nevada now requires covered larger jurisdictions to authorize ADUs, but population thresholds and the regional-planning exception mean the rule is not uniform statewide.
New Hampshire protects one attached or detached ADU by right, while state septic requirements and defined local health and safety controls remain.
ADUs are possible in parts of New Jersey, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of New Mexico, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of New York, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of North Carolina, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of North Dakota, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of Ohio, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of Oklahoma, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
Oregon has a mature ADU framework in covered urban areas, but city standards, system-development charges, utilities, wildfire, and unincorporated rural rules vary substantially.
ADUs are possible in parts of Pennsylvania, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
Rhode Island broadly protects one ADU, but the path depends on the existing structure, lot size, utilities, flood/coastal constraints, and the statute's qualifying circumstances.
ADUs are possible in parts of South Carolina, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of South Dakota, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of Tennessee, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of Texas, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
Utah's rules distinguish internal and detached ADUs and apply through defined municipal categories and lot thresholds, so the exact property and local code matter.
Vermont requires a path for one qualifying ADU, but wastewater permits, water supply, flood hazard, village design, access, and local dimensional rules remain central.
Virginia has enacted a statewide ADU right, but it does not take effect until July 1, 2027; current local ordinances control until then.
Washington provides strong ADU rights in covered urban areas, often allowing two units, but critical areas, utilities, lot configuration, and local objective standards remain.
West Virginia municipalities must allow at least one attached, detached, or internal ADU by right, while safety, utilities, flood, access, and objective site standards continue to apply.
ADUs are possible in parts of Wisconsin, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
ADUs are possible in parts of Wyoming, but there is no single statewide yes. The municipality, zoning district, unit type, and site constraints determine the path.
Washington, DC allows one accessory apartment as a matter of right in most R zones, but the principal-house size, zone, unit location, lot occupancy, alley access, and building permits still matter.
Guam expressly provides for attached and detached ADUs in qualifying R1, R2, and A zones, but lot area, sewer proximity, groundwater protection, setbacks, utilities, and environmental rules can control the outcome.